RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to compare the time spent within the target INR or Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) of patients treated with fluindione to that of patients treated with warfarin for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and followed in general practice, with the hypothesis of a better TTR with warfarin, which is the VKA most commonly prescribed in France. METHOD: Liberal nurses and general practitioners working in the Auvergne region recruited patients treated with fluindione or warfarin for NVAF. Patients' INRs (International Normalized Ratios) were recorded by medical analysis laboratories for 6 months. The primary endpoint was TTR, the secondary endpoint the number of hemorrhagic and/or thromboembolic events. RESULTS: Of the 342 participants with a mean age of 75.3 ± 9.8 years, 239 (70%) were treated with fluindione and 103 (30%) with warfarin. The mean number of INRs achieved per patient was 9.2 ± 4.0 in the fluindione group and 9.3 ± 4.0 in the warfarin group (p=0.73). The median TTR of fluindione was 81.9% [63.5; 94.1] and that of warfarin was 81.3% [65.6; 92.6] (p=0.98). Twenty-eight of 263 patients reported hemorrhage (10.6%) and 4 reported thromboembolic events (0.8%), with no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: The TTRs of patients treated for NVAF with fluindione versus warfarin do not differ significantly over an observation period of 6 consecutive months in a patient population comparable to that of the publications in this field. However, these TTRs are significantly higher than those reported in the literature, with no difference between the two treatments. The TTRs of patients treated for VANF with fluindione versus warfarin do not differ significantly over a 6-month observation period in a patient population comparable to that of the publications in this indication.
